Talk:Emerald Fennell

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Children's literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Seattle Film Critics Society#2020 Seattle Film Critics Society Awards|Seattle Film Critics Society]] The anchor (2020 Seattle Film Critics Society Awards) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Dates

We give "Years active: 2008-present" in the infobox; date 2006 for the earliest TV series in the section 2.1 Filmography table. Our External link IMDb (likely to be our source) does give 2006 for "Trial & Retribution (TV Series)

Sheena".[1]

We give birthdate 1 October 1985 in the infobox (and now in the lead where I replicated that). ISFDB gives 9 February 1985, no source.[2] Our source is not persuasive; it seems to me a 1 October 2003 notice that her 18th birthday party is covered in the November issue of Tatler, which does not clearly date the birthday or the party.[3]

--P64 (talk) 19:51, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Choice of Infobox image

@Jjj1238, DoubleCross, MurrayGreshler, Adolphus79, Rusted AutoParts, 2K LMG, SibTower1987, Eicatss, 55eo55, and Zombiesnyder: We've got two choices for infobox image (well, we have four in https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Emerald_Fennell, but two are crops of the other two).

2020 interview
2013 reading

Which is "best" is going to be a matter of preference. I prefer the 2020 interview image, both because it is more recent, and because she is looking at the camera and smiling. User:Jjj1238 prefers the 2013 reading image, because the 2020 interview image is pixelated. In either case, I would like to include both in the article because she has apparently changed dramatically in appearance between 2013 and 2020. For opinions, I'm arbitrarily pinging the last 10 named editors who edited the article, but anyone else who stumbles across this discussion is welcome to opine - I do hope this won't be a formal RfC though, as someone will invariably come up to insist those last at least 30 days and I am hoping we can find an answer quicker. What say ye, o good editors and true? --GRuban (talk) 21:15, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2013 in infobox - per WP:LEADIMAGE... it may be a little older, but it is a higher "quality" image... better focus, simple black background forces the eyes to focus on the subject, etc... and she doesn't seem to have changed her appearance so much that a casual reader glancing at the images as they read the article wouldn't recognize them as the same person... maybe put this version of the 2020 image lower below in the personal life or filmography sections? - Adolphus79 (talk) 21:40, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
2013: As already noted, I prefer the 2013 image by a mile. The 2020 image is small, of poor quality, and has a more distracting background. I don't think the pros of it being more recent and having her facing the camera outweigh its cons. I just wanted to make a note that I don't understand how we can say her appearance has changed dramatically between the two images? She looks exactly the same apart from her hair being put up in 2013 and having it down in 2020, which is barely a change in appearance. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 13:33, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a reasonable consensus. Barring further comments, I'll leave the 2013 image in the infobox, and will put the 2020 image lower in the article body where Promising Young Woman is being discussed. I will take the liberty of using that image, rather than its crop, since I do think it is clearer, and the crop is fuzzier, but if someone strongly insists on replacing it with the crop, I won't fight to the death over it. Thank you folks. --GRuban (talk)

Wiki Education assignment: Women Filmmakers

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mecstud (article contribs). Peer reviewers: OOCHIAI, Catherinefort.

— Assignment last updated by Vicccshi (talk) 09:04, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hiding film style section for now

It is simply too early to say that she has a style of making films when she's only made one so far. While she might continue to address the same themes, she might never touch on them again. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 22:06, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]